The embattled former governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, has pleaded not guilty to the 16-count charge preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over his involvement in an alleged N110 billion fraud......READ THE FULL STORY>>.....READ THE FULL STORY>>
NewsBand reports that Mr Bello was arraigned on Wednesday before Justice Maryanne Anenih of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja.
As the case unfolded today, Mr Bello, who is the first defendant, strongly denied the allegations as the charges were read by the court registrar.
– Advertisement –
Following the plea, his lead counsel, J.B. Daudu, SAN, submitted an application for bail on behalf of the former governor.
– Advertisement –
But the EFCC’s counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, opposed the motion, arguing that it had expired in October.
In response, Daudu clarified that the bail application in question was a fresh motion lodged on November 22, specifically for the first defendant.
He highlighted that the application was fully supported by an affidavit and accompanied by a written address.
“Exhibit A, which is the public summons, is very vital and the appearance of the defendant in court today shows he has respect for the law,” he said.
The Commission had moved for trial to commence immediately and was ready to call its first witness.
But Bello’s counsel argued that they were served with the charge at 11pm on November 26 and that he would need time to prepare his client.
On the bail application, Daudu SAN said the law in the country states that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.
“It is within his rights to enjoy his liberty while preparing for trial,” he said.
“The prosecution’s objection is based on the fact that he is facing charges at the Federal High Court and has refused to appear to take his plea.
“The court should not use issues from another court to determine issues before the FCT High Court,” he added.
Pointing out some paragraphs in the counter-affidavit, he said the prosecution raised issues that had to do with a matter at the Federal High Court.
“When the jurisdiction of the court is challenged, the defendant need not appear until the issues arising from the jurisdiction are resolved,” he noted.
While objecting to the submissions of Mr Bello, counsel to the anti-graft agency held that his preliminary objection was anchored on three grounds—competence of the application; factual content of the application; and application of judicial principles and guidance.
